In Atomfall, the Core i5-10200H is slightly faster than the Core i3-330M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10200H
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 208 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Sep 17, 2020 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-10200H vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
183 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
88%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10200H vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10200H vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10200H
Sep 17th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
36%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10200H Sep 17th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 17th, 2020 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 45 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR3), 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
