In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i3-N305 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-N305
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 15 vs 58 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 17% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 117 vs 100 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 1 year and 4 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 03, 2023
- Is 1 year and 4 days newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i3-N305 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
117 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
88 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-N305 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-N305 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-N305
Jan 3rd, 2023
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
0.1 GHz
3%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
81%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-N305 Jan 3rd, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2023 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $309.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1264 | Socket | LGA1700 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
