In Dead Space, the Core i3-9100T is slightly faster than the Xeon X5680. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-9100T
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space – 175 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Sep 01, 2018 vs Feb 14, 2010
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5680
No clear advantages
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100T vs Xeon X5680: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100T vs Xeon X5680 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100T vs Xeon X5680 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon X5680
Feb 14th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5680 Feb 14th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2010 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
