In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i3-9100T is slightly slower than the Xeon W-3175X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 35 vs 255 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W-3175X
- Up to 9% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 128 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 4 months and 29 days newer – Jan 30, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2018
- Is 4 months and 29 days newer
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100T vs Xeon W-3175X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100T vs Xeon W-3175X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100T vs Xeon W-3175X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
14%
L3 Cache
6 MB
16%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
86%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Xeon W-3175X
Jan 30th, 2019
Cores
28-core
100%
L3 Cache
38.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W-3175X Jan 30th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2019 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $2,999.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA3647 |
35W | Power Consumption | 255W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
