In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-9100T is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-1650 v2. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-9100T
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Sep 01, 2018 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-1650 v2
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 184 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100T vs Xeon E5-1650 v2: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Average FPS
184 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
138 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100T vs Xeon E5-1650 v2 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100T vs Xeon E5-1650 v2 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-1650 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Released | Sep 10th, 2013 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2011 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
