In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-9100T is slightly slower than the FX-4300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-9100T
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer – Sep 01, 2018 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
FX-4300
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 197 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100T vs FX-4300: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
197 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100T vs FX-4300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100T vs FX-4300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Released | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3+ |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
