The Core i3-9100T is a slightly faster gaming CPU than the EPYC 7302. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-9100T
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 35 vs 155 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the EPYC 7302
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Core i3-9100T vs EPYC 7302
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-9100T
Sep 1st, 2018
Average FPS
198
100%
Min 1% FPS
136
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-9100T vs EPYC 7302 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100T vs EPYC 7302 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100T vs EPYC 7302 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
5%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
EPYC 7302
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-9100T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Rome |
35 W | Power Consumption | 155 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 128 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
