In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i3-9100T is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 34% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 131 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 34% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 01, 2018
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100T vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
131 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.19/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100T vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100T vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
70%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
38%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2018 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
