In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-9100T is slightly slower than the Core i7-875K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-9100T
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer – Sep 01, 2018 vs May 30, 2010
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-875K
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 179 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100T vs Core i7-875K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
199 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
100%
Price, $
$174.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100T vs Core i7-875K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100T vs Core i7-875K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-875K May 30th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Released | May 30th, 2010 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $353.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
