In Deathloop, the Core i3-9100T is slightly slower than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-9100T
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2018 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100T vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100T vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100T vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
90%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
44%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
