In Atomfall, the Core i3-9100T is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2018
- Is 1 year and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100T vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100T vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100T vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2018 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
