In Deathloop, the Core i3-9100T is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 220 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 4 months and 7 days newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2018
- Is 4 months and 7 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100T vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100T vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100T vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2018 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
