In Atomfall, the Core i3-9100T is slightly faster than the Core i5-3317U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-9100T
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 204 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer – Sep 01, 2018 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer
Core i5-3317U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100T vs Core i5-3317U: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100T vs Core i5-3317U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100T vs Core i5-3317U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100T
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-3317U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
2.6 GHz
70%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100T Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3317U Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 17 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
