In Deathloop, the Core i3-9100F is same performance as the Xeon W3680. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-9100F
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Xeon W3680
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100F vs Xeon W3680: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100F vs Xeon W3680 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100F vs Xeon W3680 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon W3680
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3680 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
