In Atomfall, the Core i3-9100F is slightly faster than the Xeon W3565. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-9100F
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 209 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Nov 01, 2009
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Xeon W3565
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100F vs Xeon W3565: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.57
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100F vs Xeon W3565 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100F vs Xeon W3565 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon W3565
Nov 1st, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3565 Nov 1st, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Nov 1st, 2009 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
