In Control, the Core i3-9100F is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2643 and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's $5 cheaper!
Core i3-9100F
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 248 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 5% cheaper – $96.00 vs $100.70
- Up to 5% cheaper
- Up to 7% better value in Control – $0.38 vs $0.41/FPS
- Up to 7% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Xeon E5-2643
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100F vs Xeon E5-2643: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-2643
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
245 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
98%
Price, $
$100.7
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
93%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100F vs Xeon E5-2643 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100F vs Xeon E5-2643 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2643
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2643 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2011 |
65W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
