In Deathloop, the Core i3-9100F is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $179 cheaper!
Core i3-9100F
- Up to 67% cheaper – $89.57 vs $269.00
- Up to 67% cheaper
- Up to 66% better value in Deathloop – $0.40 vs $1.17/FPS
- Up to 66% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 229 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
219 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
95%
Price, $
$89.57
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
33%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
34%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
