In Atomfall, the Core i3-9100F is slightly faster than the Ryzen 5 2600 and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's $4 cheaper!
Core i3-9100F
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 208 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 3 days newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Apr 19, 2018
- Is 1 year and 3 days newer
- Up to 4% cheaper – $96.00 vs $99.99
- Up to 4% cheaper
- Up to 4% better value in Atomfall – $0.46 vs $0.48/FPS
- Up to 4% better value in Atomfall
Ryzen 5 2600
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 5 2600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
205 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
154 FPS
99%
Price, $
$99.99
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
96%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 5 2600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100F vs Ryzen 5 2600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Ryzen 5 2600
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 2600 Apr 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
