In Rust, the Core i3-9100F is slightly faster than the FX-8150. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $45 more expensive!
Core i3-9100F
- Up to 7% faster in Rust – 224 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Rust
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
FX-8150
- Up to 47% cheaper – $51.29 vs $96.00
- Up to 47% cheaper
- Up to 43% better value in Rust – $0.24 vs $0.42/FPS
- Up to 43% better value in Rust
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100F vs FX-8150: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
53%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
57%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
209 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
76%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100F vs FX-8150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100F vs FX-8150 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3+ |
65W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
