The Core i3-9100F is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-4130 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $57.86 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-9100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 53% cheaper – $52.02 vs $109.88
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i3-9100F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i3-9100F vs FX-4130 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, $
$109.88
47%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
53%
Core i3-9100F vs FX-4130 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100F vs FX-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100F vs FX-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-9100F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $112.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |