In GRID, the Core i3-9100F is same performance as the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-9100F
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
GRID FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100F vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
485 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
292 FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.57
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
485 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
292 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100F vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100F vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
38%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
