In Atomfall, the Core i3-9100F is slightly slower than the Core i9-9900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $309 cheaper!
Core i3-9100F
- Is 3 months and 13 days newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 3 months and 13 days newer
- Up to 78% cheaper – $89.57 vs $399.00
- Up to 78% cheaper
- Up to 77% better value in Atomfall – $0.43 vs $1.83/FPS
- Up to 77% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 218 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100F vs Core i9-9900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
208 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
96%
Price, $
$89.57
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
22%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
23%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100F vs Core i9-9900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100F vs Core i9-9900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $488.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
