In Battlefield 1, the Core i3-9100F is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $459 cheaper!
Core i3-9100F
- Up to 84% cheaper – $89.57 vs $549.00
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 82% better value in Battlefield 1 – $0.35 vs $1.95/FPS
- Up to 82% better value in Battlefield 1
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 12% faster in Battlefield 1 – 281 vs 250 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Battlefield 1
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 1 FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100F vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
250 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
96%
Price, $
$89.57
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
281 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
16%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
18%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100F vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100F vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
72%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
