In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-9100F is slightly faster than the Core i7-9700F and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $158 cheaper!
Core i3-9100F
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 226 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 64% cheaper – $89.57 vs $247.30
- Up to 64% cheaper
- Up to 65% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.39 vs $1.10/FPS
- Up to 65% better value in The Last of Us Part I
Core i7-9700F
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100F vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.57
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
223 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
99%
Price, $
$247.3
36%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
35%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100F vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100F vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
