In Deathloop, the Core i3-9100F is same performance as the Core i7-2600K. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $22 more expensive!
Core i3-9100F
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Core i7-2600K
- Up to 23% cheaper – $74.25 vs $96.00
- Up to 23% cheaper
- Up to 23% better value in Deathloop – $0.33 vs $0.43/FPS
- Up to 23% better value in Deathloop
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100F vs Core i7-2600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$96
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
77%
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100F vs Core i7-2600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100F vs Core i7-2600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
90%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-2600K Jan 9th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $317.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
65W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
