In Deathloop, the Core i3-9100F is slightly slower than the Core i3-370M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-9100F
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jun 20, 2010
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer
Core i3-370M
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 226 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100F vs Core i3-370M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
219 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
97%
Price, $
$96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100F vs Core i3-370M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100F vs Core i3-370M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-370M
Jun 20th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-370M Jun 20th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2010 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
