Core i3-9100 vs Core i9-14900KF in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-9100 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900KF, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $355.15 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-9100
- Up to 85% cheaper – $64.78 vs $419.93
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-14900KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-9100
Sep 1st, 2018
Average FPS
202
83%
Min 1% FPS
138
84%
Price, $
$64.78
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
244
100%
Min 1% FPS
165
100%
Price, $
$419.93
15%
Value, $/FPS
$1.72/FPS
19%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
70%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |