In Battlefield 1, the Core i3-9100 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $109 cheaper!
Core i3-9100
- Up to 39% cheaper – $169.95 vs $279.00
- Up to 39% cheaper
- Up to 38% better value in Battlefield 1 – $0.68 vs $1.09/FPS
- Up to 38% better value in Battlefield 1
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 2% faster in Battlefield 1 – 254 vs 249 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Battlefield 1
- Is 7 months and 20 days newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2018
- Is 7 months and 20 days newer
Battlefield 1 FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100
Sep 1st, 2018
Average FPS
249 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
99%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
60%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
62%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100 Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
