In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-9100 is slightly slower than the Core i3-3210. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $48 cheaper!
Core i3-9100
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2018 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 30% cheaper – $111.07 vs $159.00
- Up to 30% cheaper
- Up to 25% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.49 vs $0.65/FPS
- Up to 25% better value in The Last of Us Part I
Core i3-3210
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 243 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-9100 vs Core i3-3210: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100
Sep 1st, 2018
Average FPS
226 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
93%
Price, $
$111.07
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159
69%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
75%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100 vs Core i3-3210 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100 vs Core i3-3210 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100
Sep 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-9100 Sep 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2018 | Released | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
