In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-8350K is slightly slower than the Xeon X5660. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8350K
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 91 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5660
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 195 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-8350K vs Xeon X5660: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8350K vs Xeon X5660 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8350K vs Xeon X5660 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8350K
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon X5660
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8350K Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5660 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 5th, 2017 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $168.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
91 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
