In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-8350K is slightly slower than the Ryzen Embedded V1605B. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8350K
No clear advantages
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 183 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 4 months and 17 days newer – Feb 21, 2018 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 4 months and 17 days newer
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 15 vs 91 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-8350K vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Feb 21st, 2018
Average FPS
183 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8350K vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8350K vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8350K
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Feb 21st, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8350K Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Embedded V1605B Feb 21st, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Released | Feb 21st, 2018 |
| $168.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | FP5 |
| 91 W | Power Consumption | 15 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
