In Atomfall, the Core i3-8350K is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8350K
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 29% less energy – 65 vs 91 Watts
- Consumes up to 29% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8350K vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$476
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.94/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8350K vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8350K vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8350K
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8350K Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$168.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 91 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
