In Atomfall, the Core i3-8300 is slightly faster than the Xeon W3670. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8300
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 207 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer – Feb 14, 2018 vs Aug 29, 2010
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 62 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3670
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8300 vs Xeon W3670: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8300 vs Xeon W3670 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8300 vs Xeon W3670 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8300
Feb 14th, 2018
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon W3670
Aug 29th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8300 Feb 14th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3670 Aug 29th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 14th, 2018 | Released | Aug 29th, 2010 |
| $138.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
62 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
