In Control, the Core i3-8300 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5530. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8300
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 248 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer – Feb 14, 2018 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 62 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5530
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-8300 vs Xeon E5530: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8300 vs Xeon E5530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8300 vs Xeon E5530 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8300
Feb 14th, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon E5530
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
44%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8300 Feb 14th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5530 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
$138.00 | MSRP | $530.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
62W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
