In Atomfall, the Core i3-8300 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 5 1600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8300
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 206 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 months and 4 days newer – Feb 14, 2018 vs Apr 11, 2017
- Is 10 months and 4 days newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 62 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 1600X
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8300 vs Ryzen 5 1600X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 1600X
Apr 11th, 2017
Average FPS
204 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
99%
Price, $
$97.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8300 vs Ryzen 5 1600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8300 vs Ryzen 5 1600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8300
Feb 14th, 2018
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Ryzen 5 1600X
Apr 11th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8300 Feb 14th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 1600X Apr 11th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
$138.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
62W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
