The Core i3-8300 is a clear winner – it's a faster gaming CPU than the EPYC 7302 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $764.97 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-8300
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 91% cheaper – $74.98 vs $839.95
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 62 vs 155 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the EPYC 7302
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Core i3-8300 vs EPYC 7302
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-8300
Feb 14th, 2018
Average FPS
201
100%
Min 1% FPS
137
100%
Price, $
$74.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Core i3-8300 vs EPYC 7302 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8300 vs EPYC 7302 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8300 vs EPYC 7302 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8300
Feb 14th, 2018
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
EPYC 7302
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-8300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
| $138.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Rome |
62 W | Power Consumption | 155 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 128 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
