In Atomfall, the Core i3-8300 is slower than the Core i9-14900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8300
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 62 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 247 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Feb 14, 2018
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8300 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
185 FPS
100%
Price, $
$438.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8300 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8300 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8300
Feb 14th, 2018
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8300 Feb 14th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 14th, 2018 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$138.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
62 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
