In Atomfall, the Core i3-8300 is slightly slower than the Core i9-12900KS. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8300
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 62 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Core i9-12900KS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 241 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer – Apr 05, 2022 vs Feb 14, 2018
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8300 vs Core i9-12900KS: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-12900KS
Apr 5th, 2022
Average FPS
241 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$351.8
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8300 vs Core i9-12900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8300 vs Core i9-12900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8300
Feb 14th, 2018
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Core i9-12900KS
Apr 5th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8300 Feb 14th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900KS Apr 5th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 14th, 2018 | Released | Apr 5th, 2022 |
$138.00 | MSRP | $739.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
62 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
