In Atomfall, the Core i3-8300 is slightly faster than the Core i7-930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8300
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 207 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 11 months newer – Feb 14, 2018 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 7 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 62 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-930
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8300 vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
187 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
90%
Price, $
$307.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8300 vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8300 vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8300
Feb 14th, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8300 Feb 14th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 14th, 2018 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| $138.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
62 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
