In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-8300 is slightly slower than the Core i7-640M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8300
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Feb 14, 2018 vs Sep 26, 2010
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
Core i7-640M
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 205 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 35 vs 62 Watts
- Consumes up to 44% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-8300 vs Core i7-640M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8300 vs Core i7-640M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8300 vs Core i7-640M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8300
Feb 14th, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-640M
Sep 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.467 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
44%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8300 Feb 14th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-640M Sep 26th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 14th, 2018 | Released | Sep 26th, 2010 |
$138.00 | MSRP | $346.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 62 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
