In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-8300 is slightly faster than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8300
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 227 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 5% less energy – 62 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 5% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Feb 14, 2018
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-8300 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
222 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
98%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8300 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8300 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8300
Feb 14th, 2018
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8300 Feb 14th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 14th, 2018 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $138.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
62 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
