In Atomfall, the Core i3-8109U is slightly faster than the Xeon X3430. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8109U
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 203 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Apr 05, 2018 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 28 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3430
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8109U vs Xeon X3430: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8109U vs Xeon X3430 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8109U vs Xeon X3430 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8109U
Apr 5th, 2018
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3430
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8109U Apr 5th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3430 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 5th, 2018 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $189.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | LGA1156 |
28 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
