In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-8109U is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8109U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 28 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 91% faster in Battlefield 6 – 130 vs 68 FPS
- Up to 91% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 05, 2018
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-8109U vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
130 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8109U vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8109U vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8109U
Apr 5th, 2018
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
62%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8109U Apr 5th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 5th, 2018 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | LGA1700 |
28 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
