In Atomfall, the Core i3-8109U is slightly faster than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8109U
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 203 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer – Apr 05, 2018 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 20% less energy – 28 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 20% less energy
Core i7-620M
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8109U vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8109U vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8109U vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8109U
Apr 5th, 2018
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8109U Apr 5th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 5th, 2018 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $332.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
28 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Iris Pro Plus | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
