In Atomfall, the Core i3-8109U is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8109U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 28 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 months and 4 days newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Apr 05, 2018
- Is 9 months and 4 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8109U vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8109U vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8109U vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8109U
Apr 5th, 2018
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8109U Apr 5th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 5th, 2018 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | LGA1151 |
28 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
