The Core i3-8109U is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G3900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-8109U
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 45% less energy – 28 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3900
The Core i3-8109U is better in every way
Core i3-8109U vs Celeron G3900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-8109U
Apr 5th, 2018
Average FPS
201
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-8109U vs Celeron G3900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8109U vs Celeron G3900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8109U vs Celeron G3900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8109U
Apr 5th, 2018
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-8109U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Kaby Lake-R | Codename | Skylake |
28 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
| Iris Pro Plus | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
