In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-8100T is slightly slower than the Xeon X5670. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8100T
- Is 8 years and 17 days newer – Apr 02, 2018 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 8 years and 17 days newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5670
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 239 vs 230 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100T vs Xeon X5670: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100T vs Xeon X5670 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100T vs Xeon X5670 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon X5670
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5670 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
