In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-8100T is slightly slower than the Xeon X3430. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8100T
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Apr 02, 2018 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3430
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 200 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100T vs Xeon X3430: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100T vs Xeon X3430 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100T vs Xeon X3430 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon X3430
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3430 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $189.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
