In Control, the Core i3-8100T is slightly faster than the Xeon W3530. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8100T
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 247 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 8 years and 17 days newer – Apr 02, 2018 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 8 years and 17 days newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3530
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100T vs Xeon W3530: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100T vs Xeon W3530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100T vs Xeon W3530 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon W3530
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3530 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
