In Atomfall, the Core i3-8100T is slightly slower than the Core i9-9900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9900X
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 215 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 months and 17 days newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 6 months and 17 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-8100T vs Core i9-9900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9900X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
215 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$359.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-8100T vs Core i9-9900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-8100T vs Core i9-9900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-8100T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
31%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Core i9-9900X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-8100T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900X Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $989.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2066 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
